Difference Between Monocrystalline And Amorphous Solar Panels

They can also withstand the summer heat where mono or polycrystalline panels lose efficiency in the same ambient temperatures.

Difference between monocrystalline and amorphous solar panels.

Some monocrystalline panel installations in the 1970 s are still cranking out power today. Amorphous thin film is yet to prove itself in harsh conditions over a long period of time. Monocrystalline has even withstood the rigours of space travel. Monocrystalline delivers the highest power output per square inch so that the size of the panel achieves maximum power and where space is a premium or where aesthetics dictate the smallest solar panel possible.

Amorphous cells are constructed from a fine layer of silicon which enables solar panels to be more flexible and therefore lightweight. One of the reasons people tend to choose monocrystalline solar panels is because of how they look. Amorphous cells can withstand higher temperatures without output being affected compared to poly or mono crystalline cells. Amorphous panels are thin film panels that are more flexible and serve a purpose for portable installations or camping.

Thin film is still relatively new technology whereas mono and poly panels have been around for decades. The solar cells within monocrystalline panels are a single flat black color which makes them popular among homeowners. Monocrystalline solar panels are the most popular solar panels used in rooftop solar installations today. A similar power amorphous panel would be 50 larger.